Abstract
The SAFE vs. Extractive Systems Diagnostic Framework™ equips creators, entrepreneurs, and sovereign entities with a protective tool for evaluating grants, publishing platforms, partnerships, and institutional opportunities. Rooted in sovereignty and reciprocity, it ensures that intellectual property, labor, and cultural integrity are never exploited under the guise of opportunity.

---

Assertions

• Proprietary framework authored by Fifth House of Creativity Inc.
• Anchors the Asset Accelerator™ curriculum and Harmony Workshops™.
• Fully licensing-ready across multiple formats: workbook, checklist, Notion/Airtable templates, and app integration.
• Centers sovereignty and reciprocity over corporate extraction.

---

Mechanics

• 20+ diagnostic prompts spanning transparency, consent, IP rights, and reciprocity.
• Scoring system (0–45) ranks institutions: 35+ = safe, 0–24 = extractive.
• Vault Submission Protocol timestamps, redacts, and IP-tracks all outgoing proposals.
• Delivered in multiple formats: PDF workbook, slides, templates, app module.

---

Valuation

• Positioned in the tens of thousands CAD range at pre-launch.
• Scales upward with licensing, curriculum integration, and app-based adoption.
• Functions as both an educational instrument and a sovereign IP protection tool.

---

Monetization

• Licensing to accelerators, incubators, and entrepreneurship programs.
• Embedded into Harmony Workshops™ and Asset Accelerator™.
• Institutional licensing with universities, museums, and cultural networks.
• White-label enterprise toolkits for consulting and education organizations.

---

Governance

• 100% authored and owned by Amethyst Amaris / Fifth House of Creativity Inc.
• Licensing agreements restricted to sovereign terms—no external redistribution.
• Protected under the Vault Submission Protocol™ and sovereign ledger filings.

---

Compliance

• Redaction protocols safeguard IP during submission processes.
• Transparent audit trail of all proposals sent.
• Ensures only reciprocal and transparent institutions are engaged.

---

Risks & Mitigations

• Risk: Institutional resistance to transparency.
  Mitigation: Framework scores and flags them before engagement.
• Risk: Framework replication.
  Mitigation: Vault timestamping and sovereign licensing enforce origin.
• Risk: Under-valuation by extractive funders.
  Mitigation: Asset priced and positioned as sovereign IP, not free material.

---

Evidence

• Already embedded into Harmony Workshops™ and mentorship circles.
• Positioned within sovereign app modules (Second Sight by Misko’o).
• Direct alignment with the Asset Accelerator™ curriculum rollout.

---

Changelog

• v1.0 (June 2025): Framework authored + scoring finalized.
• v1.1 (2025): Vault Submission Protocol formalized.
• v1.2 (2025): Licensing deck prepared for enterprise and accelerator partners.

❓ Q&A: SAFE vs. Extractive Systems Diagnostic Framework™

Q1. What is the SAFE vs. Extractive Systems Diagnostic Framework™?
It is a proprietary tool authored by Fifth House of Creativity Inc. to help creators, founders, and institutions assess whether grants, publishing platforms, or partnerships are safe — or extractive. It functions like a protective lens, ensuring sovereignty and reciprocity remain intact.

---

Q2. How does it work?
The framework presents 20+ diagnostic prompts organized into three categories:

• Transparency (clear funding terms, disclosure, timelines).
• IP Protection (ownership, licensing, data rights).
• Reciprocity (whether the institution gives as much as it takes).

Each response is scored. The final score determines alignment:

• 35+ points = SAFE
• 25–34 points = Neutral / Requires caution
• 0–24 points = Extractive

---

Q3. Who is it for?

• Independent creators and collectives.
• Black, Indigenous, and Sovereign entrepreneurship programs.
• Accelerators, incubators, and cultural institutions.
• Universities, museums, and foundations seeking ethical frameworks.

---

Q4. What makes it different from other evaluation tools?
Unlike corporate compliance checklists, this framework is:

• Rooted in sovereignty and cultural reciprocity, not extraction.
• Authored and IP-protected under the Vault Submission Protocol™.
• Available in multi-format delivery (PDF, fillable checklist, Airtable/Notion, app module).

---

Q5. What happens if an institution scores “extractive”?
If an institution scores poorly (below 24 points), the creator or entity is advised not to submit or to only engage under sovereign licensing conditions. This prevents wasted labor, hidden IP leakage, or participation in exploitative programs.

---

Q6. How is this monetized?

• Licensing to accelerators, incubators, and Indigenous/Black entrepreneurship networks.
• Embedding in Asset Accelerator™ and Harmony Workshops™ curricula.
• Institutional toolkits for schools, universities, and cultural networks.
• White-label enterprise use under sovereign contracts.

---

Q7. What is the value of the framework?
The current pre-launch valuation is in the tens of thousands CAD, with expansion potential into the multi-million CAD range as it scales into licensing, app integrations, and enterprise adoption.

---

Q8. How is it protected?

• Vault Submission Protocol™ timestamps all outgoing proposals.
• Every copy is filed and redacted for audit protection.
• Licensing is strictly sovereign — no external redistribution.

---

Q9. Why is it needed now?
Because extractive “opportunities” — from predatory grants to hidden IP capture in publishing platforms — are more common than ever. This tool provides a clear, sovereign filter so creators can engage without exploitation.